
No.041/VIII - Jun/Jul - 99

No Island
is a Culture Unto Itself
Bali's ethnically diverse roots
-
Where to Lombok ?
Plans for Lombok's tourism industry
Buffaloes
in Black and White
The races, Sumbawan style
Lombok
Update

Gallery
Quo Vadis
Balinese Painting ?
Saraswati's
Gift
A community school in Ubud
Postcard
Cat Food
Food
Blast from the past
Adventure
Almighty mountain
Fashion
T-shirt design:art or fashion?
Books
Bali art biblio
Fiction
The beautiful rice paddy
Bali
Living Promotion
Natura
Jungle Drums
Bali Sing KenKen

want to have Bali Echo Magazine Hard Copy ?
click here
|
|


|
 INDIVIDUALISATION
Prior
to the Renewal Movement, traditional Balinese artists of the classical wayang style
painting did not sign their works. Individual creativity in art, particularly in art for
religious purposes, was not encouraged. By the end of the 1970s, however, signs of
individualization of village painting traditions began to emerge. Made Sukada pushed the
art of portrait to an unequaled level in Bali. Nyoman Meja painted trompe loeil
works from offerings and rituals. Ketut Budiana and more recently Wayan Miarta came up
with fantastic reinterpretations of old religious and mythological themes. In Batuan,
Ketut Budi and Wayan Bendi were incorporating modernity and tourism into their depictions
of village life, whilst in Pengosekan, Dewa Nyoman Batuan was dealing with philosophical
Hindu concepts through his reinterpretation of the mandala.
In a number of regards, Balinese painting of the Renewal period
retains features of the pre-colonial style - features which serve to distinguish Balinese
painting from that of the West. A modern Western painting, for example, is
centered around one or several central objects, forms or/and color surfaces. This makes it
easy for the viewer to grasp the theme right away, if the work is figurative, or
appreciate its composition intuitively, if it is abstract. In Balinese paintings of the
Renewal period, as in those of the more recent schools of painting such as Batuan,
Pengosekan, Penestanan and Padangtegal, however, the surface of the canvas so fully
occupied that no particular object stands out, either thematically or visually. Such dense
occupation of the canvas derives from pre-colonial wayang style of painting and is
suggestive of a mystic world in which niskala (otherworldly) as equally present as sekala
ones (those of the material world).
Another feature of Balinese painting is the tight and generalized
patterning. A modern Western painting is always uniquely structured and made
up of unpredictable forms. By contrast, Balinese painting of the Renewal period contains
no surprises whatsoever. Rather, it consists of a combination of a limited number of
graphic patterns and sub-patterns regularly distributed over the surface of the canvas.
For example, there are three or four types of eyes, five or six kinds of posture, seven or
eight different head-dresses, etc. Balinese apprentice painters are taught only a limited
number of forms or patterns, and may use only these, with marginal modifications or
improvements. Rather than to assert their liberty and originality of expression, the task
of a Balinese painter is to reproduce given forms and narrative themes in the manner they
have been taught. And for as long as they stay rooted in such traditions of
apprenticeship, the various village-based schools of the Renewal Movement remain more
aptly classified neo-traditional than truly modern.
SCHOOLING AND IDENTITY
Not until they began to attend state art institutions in Java, such
as the Institute of Technology in Bandung (ITB) and the ASRI art school in Yogya, were
Balinese artists afforded the opportunity to reinterpret the aesthetics that their
predecessors had failed to question. State schooling gave birth to a second wave of change
in Balinese painting which took momentum in the fifties. By this time, the quest for an
aesthetic (an aesthetic which was lager rejected) had became a goal in itself, and
tradition ceased being a state of being and became instead a statement.
next page |
|